In November 2020, Port Of Harlem will celebrate 25 years of publication. As we count down to our birthday, we will republish some of our most popular articles from our print issues. Thanks for subscribing and inviting others to join you in supporting our inclusive, diverse, pan-African publication - - now completely online. We originally published this article in the February - April 2008 print issue.
Less than three years ago, the University of Chicago’s Dr. Olufunmilayo Olopade revealed that doctors are more likely to diagnose women of African ancestry from Nigeria, Senegal, and North America with a more deadly form of breast cancer than women of European ancestry. Using race as a tool to investigate and detect the disease, Olopade’s study discovered answers that altered the way doctors treat Black women with breast cancer at home and abroad.
Also in 2005, BiDil became the first drug the United States government approved specifically for Black people. Meanwhile, researchers in suburban Chicago concluded that high rates of hypertension among African-Americans might have more to do with lifestyle than race.
Using race in the practice of medicine often reinforces old prejudices about biological differences among socially-defined people or that scientifically defined races even exist - - concepts that University of Maryland medical anthropologist Fatima Jackson finds ludicrous. “Race is a sociological and cultural construct and is far too ambiguous biologically to be genetic. In other words, you will not find a single genetic trait within a so-called "race" that is found 100% within the "race" and 0% outside of the "race,” Jackson says.